What Are the Differences Between Highlighted Topics and Funding Opportunities?

Applicants, take advantage of this overview to learn how NIH Highlighted Topics differ from Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs). There are significant distinctions that you should understand when planning a project for your next application.

Highlighted Topics are a communication tool to promote a particular area of science within the NIH mission and encourage investigator-initiated applications from the community. They provide quick, simple information that is specific to the research topic area.

In contrast to NOFOs, Highlighted Topics:

  • Give the applicant more freedom and creativity in responding to a topic.
    • Are less prescriptive than a science-specific NOFO.
    • Do not direct the applicant to use a particular NOFO, a particular due date or budget, or set other eligibility or application criteria.
    • Provide topic inspiration. Applicants use an appropriate funding opportunity, such as one of the NIH Parent Funding Announcements or other broad NIH opportunities on Grants.gov.
  • Are not funding opportunities. NIH may or may not have dedicated funding for applications in any given topic area.
  • Do not impact referral or peer review of applications.
  • Expire after 1 year. However, NIH may choose to update or renew a topic.

Highlighted topics and NOFOs are two ways to find a good fit at NIH for your research idea. Find more advice at Find Your Opportunity.

Resources

Categories: Tips Before You Submit

Related News

What We Heard From You Regarding the Proposed Cap on Simultaneous NIH Research Project Grant Support, and Our Next Steps

In June, we sought your feedback on a proposed approach to cap the number of Research Project Grants (RPG) a researcher can be principal investigator on simultaneously (NOT-OD-26-086). The proposal explored whether limits on simultaneous RPG support could contribute to a more balanced research portfolio. Here, we share some high-level outcomes from your thoughtful and helpful comments, which will inform our next steps.

Top Stories

Why Does It Take Time After Advisory Council for NIH to Make a Funding Decision

We recognize it is stressful for researchers when waiting on NIH’s funding decision for submitted applications. After going through initial peer review, NIH Institute, Center, or Office (ICO) Advisory Councils review applications and make recommendations for the Institute or Center director’s consideration.

You Ask, We Answer

For technical issues E-mail OER Webmaster